11December2019

Nano-Micro Letters

Cell Nanomechanics Based on Dielectric Elastomer Actuator Device

View ResearcherID and ORCID

Zhichao Li1, #, Chao Gao1, #, Sisi Fan1, Jiang Zou3, 4, Guoying Gu3, 4, Mingdong Dong5, Jie Song1, 2, *

Abstract
icon-htmlFull Text Html
icon-pdf-smPDF w/ Links
icon-citExport Citation
Figures
+Show more

Nano-Micro Lett. (2019) 11: 98

First Online: 11 November 2019 (Review)

DOI:10.1007/s40820-019-0331-8

*Corresponding author. E-mail: sjie@sjtu.edu.cn (Jie Song)

 

Abstract

 


Toc

As a frontier of biology, mechanobiology plays an important role in tissue and biomedical engineering. It is a common sense that mechanical cues under extracellular microenvironment affect a lot in regulating the behaviors of cells such as proliferation and gene expression, etc. In such an interdisciplinary field, engineering methods like the pneumatic and motor-driven devices have been employed for years. Nevertheless, such techniques usually rely on complex structures, which cost much but not so easy to control. Dielectric elastomer actuators (DEAs) are well known as a kind of soft actuation technology, its research prospect in biomechanical field is gradually concerned due to their properties just like large deformation (100%), fast response (1 ms). In addition, DEAs are usually optically transparent and can be fabricated into small volume, which make them easy to cooperate with regular microscope to realize real-time dynamic imaging of cells. This paper first reviews the basic components, principle, and evaluation of DEAs, then overview some corresponding applications of DEAs for cellular mechanobiology research. We also provide a comparison between DEA-based bioreactors and current custom-built devices, and share some opinions about their potential applications in the future according to widely reported results via other methods.


 

Keywords

Dielectric elastomer actuator; Mechanical stimulus; Bioreactor; Mechanobiology

 

Full Text Html

1 Introduction

    Mechanobiology is an emerging science concern about the effects of mechanical loadings and physical forces on cell behaviors and diseases [1]. Biological cells and tissues live in vivo environments are exposed to several mechanical stimulations such as stretching and contracting, etc. As reported so far, mechanical loadings can be sensed by cells and then influence cellular behaviors like migration, proliferation, orientation, and gene expression [2-9]. Additionally, some diseases such as atherosclerosis [10] and cancers [11] are proved to have similar relation with mechanical cues as well. For example, Kim et al. [12] found that mechanical effects can affect cellular remodeling and regeneration of tissue, which means the possibility to develop cell-based therapies. Besides, Park et al. [13] confirmed that equiaxial and uniaxial strain have different induction effects on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. In a word, people are now trying to achieve better understand of cellular mechanism for the purpose of developing more effective and advanced biomedical technology.
    However, studying mechanical stimulus in vitro directly remains difficult because the traditional cell culture technology cannot provide such mechanics, so the first problem need to solve is to apply mechanical stimulations to cells while cultured in vitro to mimic the true environment in vivo. As reported so far, some methods have been taken to apply mechanical-loadings on cells, including hydrostatic pressure and fluid shear [14-16], other interesting devices such as biochip [17], wrinkled skin-on-a-chip [18], pneumatic stretching system [19], motor-driven system [20], piezoelectric [21], and optical actuation methods [22, 23]. More recently, a custom-built open-source stretch system assembled from laser-cut acrylic plates emerged [24]. In general, such a gap between engineering and biology is attractive and even profitable, some companies have entered this market and are selling their products, which including Flexcell system [25, 26] from Bio-Equip, STB-1400 [27] from Strex, etc. Generally, these means require complex designs and result in complicated system structures and besides, high costs. In contrast, dielectric elastomer actuators (DEAs) are more simple and have advantages of highly controllable deformation, sub-millisecond response time, optically transparent and can be integrated with cell culture environment conveniently. Since Pelrine et al. [28] presented their landmark discovery about electrostatically activated elastomeric actuators in 2000, this novel technology has been used in many fields, such as energy harvesters [29], tactile displays [30], soft robotics [31, 32] and what to be emphasized here, mechanically biological cells stimulus, and the potential application as the bio-sensor to measure the cellular contraction force.
    In this review, we firstly introduce the basic dielectric elastomer actuator technology simply, including the components and actuation mechanism of the DEA devices, and the characterization methods. Secondly we overview the applications of DEA-based devices in the field of cellular mechanical loading, which can be divided into bio-stretching device and biosensor. Thirdly, comparisons of popular commercial methods and DEA-based devices are conducted. Lastly, we further provide our prospect on DEAs’ applications in the future mechanobiology research.

2 Components of the DEA Devices

    DEAs are typically simple in structure and require very different materials with traditional actuators like electric motors. Briefly, the dielectric elastomer membrane (DEM) and the compliant electrodes are what demanded,the pre-stretched DEM sandwiched by electrodes [33, 34] and then fixed by rigid frames. These two main components are the key to determine the performance of DEA-based devices, combine with various pre-stretch sets to make DEA forms diversified.
2.1 Dielectric Elastomer Membrane
    The DEM belongs to one subcategory of electroactive polymers (EAPs), which can respond to electrical stimulation with significant size or shape change, and has already emerged as a new actuation material [35]. As one of the most important components of DEAs, the material properties of DEM directly determine the actuation performance of DEAs. Since 1990s, researchers have conducted massive experiments to find proper DEM materials, such as silicones, polyurethanes, acrylics, nitrile rubbers. Among these, silicones and acrylics are the two most commonly used materials. The most widely used acrylic DEM are 3M VHB 4910 and 3M VHB 4905 [36]. Both of them are made of a mixture of aliphatic acrylate, which shows a property of high viscosity, flexibility, and tensile resistance. However, the VHB-based DEAs show serious viscoelastic nonlinearity that makes the precision tracking control challenge [37-42].
    Silicone rubber, which has good elastic properties, fast strain response speed, and.nhanced  DE membrance by changeynce.  elatomer can maintain constant modulus at higher temperature, is one of the commonly used matrices for the preparation of DEM materials although the deformation degree of silicone membrane is low. Because of its weak viscoelasticity characteristic, the response speed of silicone film is faster and shows higher efficiency. Besides, Akbari et al. [43] have presented theoretical guidelines for improving the deformation actuation of silicon based DEM by changing the prestretch ratios.
    Actually, DEA devices used for biomedical and bioinspired systems have already been reported [44], such as refreshable braille displays for the blinds and bioinspired tunable lenses for the visually impaired. However, as reported by Herbert Shea and colleagues, for cells and tissues related applications, the DEM materials to be chosen should satisfy some special requirements [45]: firstly, they should be non-cytotoxic and compatible with standard cell culture protocols like sterilization and incubation; secondly, they need to be optically transparent for the convienience of integrating with the optical microscopes. After that, the selection of DEMs can be flexible since various designs and fabrications may be chosen. For example, some works used Sylgard 186 (Dow Corning) as the DEM and cover it with Silbione LSR4305 (BlueStar Silicones) as the biocompatible membrane, which contacts the biological samples directly [45, 46]. Besides, as the alternative, other PDMS has been used as well [47-49]. In our group, ELASTOSIL Film 2030 250/100 from WACKER was used to  meet the principles above.
2.2 Materials and Techniques for Electrodes
    Another indispensable element for DEAs is the compliant electrode, well-designed electrodes patterning can bring the charges to the target shape and area, therefore form the desired deformation. As commonly accepted, the electrode materials should meet some properties: 1) The ability to maintain conductivity during large strains; 2) Its stifness can be ignorable, comparing with that of DEM; 3) The ability to maintain good stability [50]; 4) It is Preferably to be patternable for conducting flexible electrode designs [51]. For applications on cells and tissues, as reported by Samuel Rosset et al. [52], both manufacturability, miniaturization, impact on DEA performance, and the compatibility with low-voltage operation need to be taken into consideration. In this section, some widely used electrode materials are introduced.
2.2.1 Carbon-based Electrodes
    Because the low stiffness and ability to maintain conductive at large strain [51-53], carbon-based electrodes are the most popular electrode materials for DEAs, typically they can be divided into three main categories: carbon powder, carbon grease, and conductive rubber.
    Carbon powder electrodes The main outstanding merit of powder-based electrodes is their less contributory to the stiffness of the DEM. Apply the loose carbon powders directly on the membrane became the solid choice in the early stage. However, the disadvantages of carbon powder are obvious: It is difficult to maintain conductivity at large strain [54, 55], and lifetime is also limited because of the detaching of conductive particles from electrodes [52].
    Conductive rubber electrodes Similar but not identical with carbon grease, conductive rubbers are produced through directly mixing conductive particles with silicone. As a result, the ablation or migration of the conductive particles can be avoid, and the lifetime of the electrodes can be extended. However, impact on the stiffness of the DE is not negligible [52].
    With less requirements on precision, thickness homogeneity, and shape of the electrodes, they can be easily painted on the DEM. Nevertheless, for cellular research, the DEAs usually command accurate electrode pattern. Here we introduce several techniques to precisely fabricate the carbon electrodes on the DEM as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1 The techniques for creating carbon-based compliant electrodes. a Shadow masking: Using a shadow mask to selectively spray the carbon material on target area, then removing the mask to get the final electrodes. b Stamping process: Using patterned elastomeric stamp to pick-up the carbon material and stamping it on the DEM. c Printing: the carbon-based materials can be made into conductive ink, then using printing technology to pattern electrodes. d Laser ablation: the thick PDMS-carbon composite layers can be patterned by laser ablation and bonded to PDMS membrane by oxygen plasma activation.

Fig. 1 The techniques for creating carbon-based compliant electrodes. a Shadow masking: Using a shadow mask to selectively spray the carbon material on target area, then removing the mask to get the final electrodes. b Stamping process: Using patterned elastomeric stamp to pick-up the carbon material and stamping it on the DEM. c Printing: the carbon-based materials can be made into conductive ink, then using printing technology to pattern electrodes. d Laser ablation: the thick PDMS-carbon composite layers can be patterned by laser ablation and bonded to PDMS membrane by oxygen plasma activation.

    Clearly, a mask covered on the surface of the membrane can be helpful to paint the carbon material into desired shape. Pelrine et al. have presented their work for fabricating loose carbon grease and powders based electrodes [55]. To improve the uniformity, Schlaak et al. [56] proposed the use of spray coating as presented in Fig. 1a, which is an efficient manufacture method and can be used for commercial applications. Similarly, the electrodes can be stamped on the DEM [57]. In such case, fabricate a soft stamp into desired pattern by replication on an etched silicon negative master as shown in Fig. 1b. Besides, printing techniques can also be used to pattern electrodes as presented in Fig. 1c since the carbon-based materials can be made into conductive ink [52]. As reported by Krebs, printing methods have been utilized to manufacture flexible devices [58]. More advanced, high-resolution and robust compliant electrodes for silicon-based soft actuators and sensors are completed through laser ablation technology [59] (Fig. 1d).
2.2.2 Metallic Electrodes
    Due to the low resistance, metallic electrodes are also alternative for the field of DEAs. However, the high Young’s modulus and relative small strain make it difficult to directly pattern them. To overcome this drawback, some fabrication methods have been proposed, such as photolithography, depositing [52] and implantation. Among these methods, DEAs with implanted metallic electrodes present better performance. Here we introduce two methods to implant metallic electrodes: Filtered Cathodic Vacuum Arc Implantation (FCVA) and Supersonic Cluster Beam (SCB) Implantation. The principle of FCVA can be  depicted simply [60-63]: The plasma generated from the source consist of metal ions, electrons and the undesirable macroparticles, and the magnetic filter is used to remove the macroparticles from the plasma, nanometer-size clusters can be generated through this technology (Fig. 2a). Similarly, the progress of SCB is shown in Fig. 2b: Vaporize the metal firstly, then use a pulse of inert gas to quench the plasma to form the neutrally charged clusters. Then, the clusters can be injected into the deposition chamber and form metal/PDMS nanocomposite layer. Figure 2c, d shows the nanostructure of the metallic electrodes that are produced via FCVA and SCB, respectively.

Fig. 2 a The schematic picture of FCVA. A high voltage (600 V) impulsion initiates the main arc from the cathode, the filter helps to trap the macroparticles and the negatively substrate holder accelerates the positive ions through the plasma sheath. b The schematic of SCB progress. The Au NPs nanoparticles generated from the cluster source is accelerated by a carrier gas in a supersonic expansion, then focused by aerodynamic lense. The cluster beam can be injected into the deposition chamber and impacted on the surface of a thermo-retractable polystyrene (PS) sheet. c The product of FCVA. d TEM image of the product of SCB.

Fig. 2 a The schematic picture of FCVA. A high voltage (600 V) impulsion initiates the main arc from the cathode, the filter helps to trap the macroparticles and the negatively substrate holder accelerates the positive ions through the plasma sheath. b The schematic of SCB progress. The Au NPs nanoparticles generated from the cluster source is accelerated by a carrier gas in a supersonic expansion, then focused by aerodynamic lense. The cluster beam can be injected into the deposition chamber and impacted on the surface of a thermo-retractable polystyrene (PS) sheet. c The product of FCVA. d TEM image of the product of SCB.

2.2.3 Transparent Electrodes
    Basically, the conductive materials which meet the requirements of DEA electrodes application are non-transparent. However, some works proposed several transparent electrodes that can be potentially used in optical applications. As reported, Hu et al. [55] have studied transparent and conductive nanotube thin films on electrical and optical properties. Kovacs et al. [66] found that loose carbon black with extremely thin thickness can be partly transparent when applied on adhesive acrylic membrane. Implanted palladium and gold electrodes have also been reported to be possibly present transparency with a ratio between 35% and 70%, the value is depended by the metal and the implanted dose [63]. Besides, ionic hydrogel is a novel, ordinarily, and transparent material for electrodes of DEAs [67, 68]. Combining ionic hydrogel with 3D printing, people successfully fabricated electric-driven soft actuators that can achieve a maximum vertical displacement of 9.78±2.52 mm at 5.44 kV [69].
    As mentioned above, DEAs for cellular research need to be optically transparent. Therefore, the development of transparent electrodes can accelerate the applications of DEAs of cellular using, before that, much work is still demanded to develop such novel electrodes materials and techniques.

3 Actuation Mechanism of DEAs

    In general, DEA is a device that converts electrical energy into mechanical deformation [28]. The basic actuation mechanism is presented in Fig. 3, a dielectric elastomer film is sandwiched by the patterned electrodes on both top and bottom sides, high voltage (HV) induced compression along thick direction causes in-plane expansion. This physical response of dielectric elastomers can be linked with their Maxwell stress effect [50]. Since the electrode patterns can be various, the specific strain characterization of DEAs can be different in the concrete cases. Typically, the strain along the thickness direction SM  [70] and the effective electromechanical pressure P [71] of the elastomer membrane can be used to describe the strain level. 

11 98 gs12

where is the permittivity of vacuum,  is the dielectric constant of the elastomer, E is the electric field applied, and s is the elastic compliance.

Fig. 3 The working principle of dielectric elastomer actuators (DEAs) and the classical DEAs for cellular mechanical stimulus. a The device consists of a soft dielectric elastomer sandwiched between compliant electrodes on both top and bottom sides, the actuator keeps static without voltage applied, and b motivated when the voltage is applied. Similarly, c for cellular mechanical-loading, the DEA keep the original state without HV applied, and d deforms under actuated then generates two regions as tensile strain area and compressive area

Fig. 3 The working principle of dielectric elastomer actuators (DEAs) and the classical DEAs for cellular mechanical stimulus. a The device consists of a soft dielectric elastomer sandwiched between compliant electrodes on both top and bottom sides, the actuator keeps static without voltage applied, and b motivated when the voltage is applied. Similarly, c for cellular mechanical-loading, the DEA keep the original state without HV applied, and d deforms under actuated then generates two regions as tensile strain area and compressive area

    Generally, for the DEA-based devices, it is noteworthy that the pre-stretch of DEM is another indispensable design parameter that can affect the performance. Obviously, pre-stretching can prevent the buckling of the dielectric elastomer when electrically activated. Secondly, pre-stretching the elastomer contributes to improve the performance of DEAs since it can increase electromechanical instability (EMI) of the membrane [28, 73-76]. Additionally, equiaxial and uniaxial pre-stretch can help to generate equiaxial and uniaxial strain, respectively. Therefore, it is common to change the amplitude and ratio of pre-stretch to generate desired behaviors of DEAs.
    Figure 3c, d shows the classical configuration of DEAs for cell mechanical stimulus [72]. Usually, the rigid frame is necessary to hold pre-stretch of the DEM. Once the voltage applied, the area with electrodes is expanded while the rest area is compressed. As a result, the expanded area is defined as active and can be used for stretching the cells, the compressed area called passive and can be adopted to compress the cells.

4 Evaluation of DEAs

    It is important to understand cellular environment when studying cells’ responses to the mechanical loadings, so precisely characterization of DEA devices is indispensable, that is, we need to gain the strain distribution of our target area in the DEA. Currently, finite element modeling (FEM) and image processing (machine vision and digital image correlation) techniques are widely used to calculate the strain distribution.
    FEM is a non-contact way that common-used in many fields to calculate stress and strain distribution of a mechanical/structural system [77]. To complete the FEM, some basic parameters of the materials are required such as Poisson’s ration, elastic modulus, etc. Constrain the model with certain boundary conditions and divide it through multiple grids, strain will be calculated in every single grid and finally generate the whole strain distribution. For example, Akbari et al. [48] optimize the geometric configuration of the actuator by using a simplified FEM.
    Image processing technology can be helpful as well and seems more popular among the people who study cells via DEAs. Similar with FEM, digital image correlation (DIC) is another non-contact method to obtain the strain distribution. Set the region of interest (ROI) on the original image, the algorithm conducts correlation calculation in the image after deformation to find the most relevant points/pixel with the original one, then displacement and strain can be calculated. Recently, Blaber et al. [78] published their open-source 2D digital image correlation software. With this software, the strain distribution of the actuator can be successfully measure by processing the pictures in actuated and rest state. For instance, as shown in Fig. 4, Poulin et al. [79] obtained the strain distribution at the ROI from both compressive and tensile modes through DIC. Analogously, it’s easy to complete the characterization when the shapes of electrodes changed [45].

Fig. 4 Example of characterizing DEA system via DIC. The white rectangle is region of interest (ROI) set. Strain distribution of both compressive and tensile mode can be obtained through DIC.

Fig. 4 Example of characterizing DEA system via DIC. The white rectangle is region of interest (ROI) set. Strain distribution of both compressive and tensile mode can be obtained through DIC.

    Besides the strain distribution, the basic deformation-voltage responses (average strain) can be obtained through image processing as well. As reported by Rosset et al., they measured the strain of actuator using machine vision via a LabVIEW image processing to track the four corners of the electrodes [80]. After calibration, the coordinates of these four corners that both under actuated and non-actuated states are recorded, so that the curve of voltage induced strain can be plot.

5 DEA-based Devices for Cellular Research

    According to the different cell amount that the DEA-based bioreactors may apply in, they can be divided into two categories: one for single cell and the other for a small population of cells or in other word, tissue engineering.
5.1 DEA-based Bio-Stretcher/Reactor for Single Cell
    For single cell’s mechanical stimulation, technologies like microfluidics [81], atomic force microscope [82], microelectromechanical systems [83], and optical tweezers [84] have been widely used. The DEA-based devices for single cell mechanical loading rely on the principle that cells may deform with the stretchable substrate where they already adhere. Now, such devices are at the stage of conceptual design. Figure 5 shows the schematic of DEA designed for stimulating single cell. Implanted gold ion electrodes are patterned on both sides of PDMS film [48]. Continuous electrodes are implanted on the top side of membrane while the bottom side has narrow implanted electrodes. Red lines are ion-implanted electrodes on the bottom of a PDMS membrane and horizontal lines are trenches with square cross-section. Mechanical stretch happens in the intersection regions of the top and bottom electrodes. Such design forms numerous units and Fig. 5c actually shows four units for four cells to be stretched [47]. When the DEA is actuated by a voltage of 3.8 KV, the membrane expands by 56% along the x-axis (Fig. 5d).

Fig.5 The schematic of DEA designed for single cells’ mechanical stretching. a, b The micro-actuator arrays are designed for single-cell, each intersection of vertical lines and horizontal lines forms an individual actuator, where cells can be stretched. c Top view of a small part (four micro-actuators contained) obtained by microscope, the membrane is pre-stretched along y-axis. The bright lines aligned vertically are the ion-implanted electrodes on the top side of PDMS membrane while the dark lines aligned horizontally are the bottom electrodes. d Micrograph of one actuator.

Fig.5 The schematic of DEA designed for single cells’ mechanical stretching. a, b The micro-actuator arrays are designed for single-cell, each intersection of vertical lines and horizontal lines forms an individual actuator, where cells can be stretched. c Top view of a small part (four micro-actuators contained) obtained by microscope, the membrane is pre-stretched along y-axis. The bright lines aligned vertically are the ion-implanted electrodes on the top side of PDMS membrane while the dark lines aligned horizontally are the bottom electrodes. d Micrograph of one actuator.

5.2 DEA-based Bio-Reactor for Small Population of Cells
    For a small group of living cells, it is more flexible to generate tensile or compression strains through DEAs, and the corresponding research is shown in Fig. 6. In 2014, Alexandre et al. [72] reported that the stress in passive region of DEAs can be utilized to compress the cells. Since then, in 2016, they developed the DEA-based cell stretcher to stimulate lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) and demonstrated that DEAs can be interfaced with living cells and used to supply mechanical-loading [45]. After that, an innovative muscle-like bioreactor (mimicking the small intestinal) for the investigation of physiological phenomena was described by Cei et al. [71]. The bioreactor can maintain its performance even if incubated with Caco-2 cells for 21 days until the differentiation of cells can be observed. In 2018, the actuator that can generate alternately tensile and compression strains were proposed by Poulin et al. [78]. Afterward, as the newest work, for the purpose of investigating drastic cases like rapid stretch effects on cardiac tissue, Imboden et al. [86] show their high-speed mechano-active multielectrode actuator, which can provide stimulus of mechano-electrical coupling mechanism.

Fig.6 The DEA devices for cellular stimulations. Uniaxial compression was proposed by Alexandre et al. in 2014, which harnesses stress in passive region of the DEA and stimulates the cells on top of the region. In 2016, they fabricated the DEA for uniaxial stretching of cells, and LECs were used to test the device. Poulin et al. proposed the active cell culture substrate which can produce complex strain patterns with extremely high strain rates in 2018. In 2019, more advanced DEA-based bioreactor providing mechanoelectrical coupling stimulus is proposed.

Fig.6 The DEA devices for cellular stimulations. Uniaxial compression was proposed by Alexandre et al. in 2014, which harnesses stress in passive region of the DEA and stimulates the cells on top of the region. In 2016, they fabricated the DEA for uniaxial stretching of cells, and LECs were used to test the device. Poulin et al. proposed the active cell culture substrate which can produce complex strain patterns with extremely high strain rates in 2018. In 2019, more advanced DEA-based bioreactor providing mechanoelectrical coupling stimulus is proposed.

    Such an progress actually indicates the diversified future of the DEA-based bioreactor. DEAs can be applicable for different purpose and further fabricated into the bioreactor with specific function.
5.3 DEAs Designed for the Measurement of Traction Force of Cells
    Monitoring the biological indicators of cells e.g., metabolic analysis, biomarker detectation, cell force and strain is very necessary for investigating the cells’ behaviors and understanding some diseases. The metabolic analysis and biomarker detectation mainly rely on mass spectrometry and electrochemistry ways [87-89], while force sensing technologies predominantly rely on optical methods [90] that hinders scaling up of devices for the purpose of parallelized and real-time measurements. Except for the function of passing mechanical loading to the living cells, as reported, the DEAs can also be the potential sensors to measure traction force of cells. For example, in 2017, Rosset et al. used the DEAs to achieve sub-cellular resolution measurement of cell traction forces [91]. A DEA-based sensor system for measuring the contraction force of smooth muscle cells was also reported [92], and the principle is shown in Fig. 7a: The system contains three main parts, including the DEA-based cell culture support (24-well units is designed for high throughput parallel measurement), the read-out electronics and the computer to show the measured data. Actually, every culture well works independently to sense the expansion that caused by cellular contraction, and the changes of the device capacitance which is caused by the contraction. Cell contraction causes changes in the geometry, i.e. diameter of the cell region and thickness of the DEM from  to  and t to , respectively. These changes consequently cause changes of the device capacitance that can be measured.

Fig.7 a Schematic representation of the measure system proposed by Araromi et al. in 2015: The 24-well cell culture supports are equipped with integrated strain and force measurement sensors that are base on DEA. Besides, the electrical read-out allows for high throughput parallel measurement in real-time. b Optimizing of the DEA-based sensors. Parameters such as R,  , A, and B are used to model the system.

Fig.7 a Schematic representation of the measure system proposed by Araromi et al. in 2015: The 24-well cell culture supports are equipped with integrated strain and force measurement sensors that are base on DEA. Besides, the electrical read-out allows for high throughput parallel measurement in real-time. b Optimizing of the DEA-based sensors. Parameters such as R, A, and B are used to model the system.

    In 2016, the same group proposed further optimization of thin-film sensors for contractility measurement of muscle cells [93]. In this work, they proposed their modeling to predict sensor behavior as shown in Fig. 7b. They describe the system based on cylindrical coordinates which use R and  to model the in-plane information, Z to present the thickness information. The final capacitance after cell contraction can be expressed as Eq. 3:

11 98 gs3

where R is the radial position of an arbitrary point in the sensing region before pre-stretch and cell contraction, t is the initial sensing layer thickness before pre-stretch,  and  are the permittivity of free space and the relative permittivity of the sensing layer, respectively. A is the radius of cell region before pre-stretch, B is the radius of the DEM before pre-stretch, and  is the stretch in the thickness direction (assuming material incompressibility).

6 Comparison Between Usual Commercial Bioreactors and the DEA-based Ones

    In this part, we provide comparison between the widely used commercial devices and the DEA-based ones. The traditional mechanical systems can be typically divided into two categories, the motor-driven (STB series from STREX) and the pneumatic (FX series from Flexcell). Generally, almost all of the mechanical methods to stimulate cells in vitro rely on a membrane (usually PDMS or silicone that are biocompatible) to deliver the stimulus. For the pneumatic devices, the membrane is placed on the holder, a loading post is filled to form the air chamber, and a channel is made to allow the operation of pumping ( Fig. 8a). Once we pump air out from the chamber, the atmospheric pressure will squeeze the membrane into the chamber and consequently create a tensile strain. In contrast, motor-based system is more direct. The membrane (or chamber) is installed on two holders. One is fixed while the other is movable and connect with the motor through driven components. When activate signal is applied, the motor can generate corresponding rotation, the driven components then translate the rotation to traction of the movable holder for stretching the membrane (Fig. 8b). For the DEA-based bio-stretcher, uniaxial prestretch of DEM usually is set to produce the strain along one desired direction. Biocompatible membrane in where cell is cultured firstly is placed on the DEA after electrodes patterning, then use rigid frames to fix the membranes. The compliant electrodes will expand along the reverse direction of prestretch once HV is applied, then cells can be stretched (Fig. 8c). Usually, the volume of the pneumatic and motor-driven devices appear bigger than the DEAs, because of the extra elements such as air chambers, movable holders, etc. Besides, the pneumatic and motor-driven methods require the pump and motor to activate the membrane, in other word, these are indirectly control system, facing problems that strain can be limited since the original activated signal which need to be convert may beyond the performance of the pump or motor. In contrast, DEA-based devices are motivated directly by the electric signal, which is another unique advantage.

Fig. 8 Schematic of typical pneumatic, motor-driven and the DEA-based device. a Side view of classic pneumatic cell stretching devices. An air chamber is formed by combining the membrane, holder and loading post. Pumping air from the chamber can generate pressure difference that lead to absorption of membrane and stretch the cells. b Side view of motor-driven stretching devices. The membrane with seeded cells is matched with two holders, one is movable while the other is not. The movable holder connects with motor through driven components (gears, track, etc.). Once control signal input to the motor, generated motion drags the holder, causing stretching strain as consequence. c Side and top view of DEA-based cell stretcher. The DEA is sandwiched by biocompatible membrane, and then fixed byrigid frame

Fig. 8 Schematic of typical pneumatic, motor-driven and the DEA-based device. a Side view of classic pneumatic cell stretching devices. An air chamber is formed by combining the membrane, holder and loading post. Pumping air from the chamber can generate pressure difference that lead to absorption of membrane and stretch the cells. b Side view of motor-driven stretching devices. The membrane with seeded cells is matched with two holders, one is movable while the other is not. The movable holder connects with motor through driven components (gears, track, etc.). Once control signal input to the motor, generated motion drags the holder, causing stretching strain as consequence. c Side and top view of DEA-based cell stretcher. The DEA is sandwiched by biocompatible membrane, and then fixed byrigid frame

    When it comes to specific using, several parameters may be important to assess the devices, including available frequency and strain. Here, we obtain the information of several well-known commercial motor-driven and pneumatic systems by searching their manual on the website [94, 95] and list them in Table 1. The performance of the pneumatic highly depend on the membrane and the vacuum pump, while for motor-driven devices, the key element is the motor itself. As mentioned above, DEAs are directly activated via electric signal without the progress of conversion from control signal to motor driver or vacuum pump that can restrain the performance, i.e. the faster response time and higher frequency may be obtained. Thus, DEA-based devices can theoretically provide more various loadings than the other two ways. In addition, due to the compact volume and highly flexible design of DEAs, real-time monitoring of cells via microscope is feasible and relatively simple. For instance, Poulin et al. [45] presented the DEA-based real-time monitor cellular stimulating system (Fig. 9a). The cell seeded DEA device is placed in a simplified transparent incubator over the microscope objective, and the microscope is programmed to periodically capture the cell picture. In addition, for clear observation of cellular internal elements like nucleus under mechanical stimulus, staining is also compatible in such system. They stained the human lung carcinoma cells A549 and recorded the dynamic position of cellular DNA and mitochondria during uniaxial stretch. The nuclei displacements they measured show a linear relation with the initial nuclei positions, which can be the evidence that DEA induced strain is transferred to the cells [78].

Table 1 The performance parameters of different technology and models

11 98 table1

    In a word, DEAs can be a greater available carrier choice for cellular mechanical loading research. Therefore, we give a brief outlook of DEAs’ applications (next section) and hope to enlighten the combination of mechaobiology and DEAs.

Fig. 9 Real-time monitor system through DEA-devices. a Schematic of the whole system with DEA-based cellular stretcher and inverted microscope. The DEA is motivated and controlled by the high voltage source, a mini incubator is used to provide the standard environment for living cells (lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) used), the microscope is used to monitor the cells. b Imaging of lung cells A549 during stretching: The DNA and Mitochondria are stained as blue and green, respectively. Top picture shows displacement track of the intracellular content of A549 at 40× magnification, the arrows with different color and length refer to different degrees of displacements. Bottom picture shows the nucleus track of A549,  =0.12 along the stretch orientation is measured through this method, and a line is found to fit the nuclei displacement perfectly.

Fig. 9 Real-time monitor system through DEA-devices. a Schematic of the whole system with DEA-based cellular stretcher and inverted microscope. The DEA is motivated and controlled by the high voltage source, a mini incubator is used to provide the standard environment for living cells (lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) used), the microscope is used to monitor the cells. b Imaging of lung cells A549 during stretching: The DNA and Mitochondria are stained as blue and green, respectively. Top picture shows displacement track of the intracellular content of A549 at 40× magnification, the arrows with different color and length refer to different degrees of displacements. Bottom picture shows the nucleus track of A549, =0.12 along the stretch orientation is measured through this method, and a line is found to fit the nuclei displacement perfectly.

7 Outlook of DEAs in Cellular Mechanical Loading Research

    Phenomenon of cellular and tissue behavior adjustment is strongly associated with the changes of extracellular matrix (ECM) and protein expression, which can be determined by the loading and cell type. For in vitro cellular stimulus, we can deform the cell membrane by stretching the cell adhesion substrate [96, 97]. Over the past years, people have conducted interesting researches on the load-sensitive cells, trying to discover the relations between cellular responses and different loading conditions. Although most of the published results were completed by the pneumatic and motor-driven devices, comparison suggests that DEA-based devices share the properties as well or even better, so the following applications can theoretically be the references for development of DEA-based bio-reactors.
    Among the various cellular responses, reorientation of the cells is intuitively visible, and the relevant research has been carried out for a long time. In 1986, Dartsh et al. [98, 99] presented their work to cyclic stretch smooth muscle cells, and the result shows uniform reorientation of the uniaxial stretch cells compared to the control group. Then, experimental results suggest that cells form weak adhesions on the soft substrates [100], which allow the reorientation under in-vitro mechanical loading. Based on these results, people tempted to model this phenomenon. They proposed that mechanical-sense system of cells is the reason why cells response to the loadings, they mainly focus on the state dynamics of cells during reorientation such as focal adhesions (FAs), stress fibers (SFs), and actin cytoskeleton. Some representative theories were raised. For example, a widespread theory once proposed that cells realign along the zero (or minimal) strain direction to maintain original undisturbed state [101], and the theory can be expressed as Eq. 4: 

11 98 gs4

where  and  refer to the strain along x and y directions, respectively. However, Livne et al. [8] found deviation between the experimental cellular reorientation and theoretical predictions above, and proposed the new theory that regards the reorientation as result of dissipative process to relax the passively stored elastic energy, and can be predicted as Eqs. 5 and 6:

11 98 gs5

11 98 gs6

    This function is valid for r[1-1/b ,1+1/(b-1)], where b  is a dimensionless parameter which is related with cellular Young’s Moduli along the polarized reference system (Fig. 10). For verification, they tracked cells under various original angles and stretch parameters and obtain well fit between the experimental results and the predicts. More recently, Chagnon-Lessard et al. [102] demonstrated that strain gradients guide the orientation as well. The mechanism was described as gradient avoidance response, and the statistic results show great similarity of cellular arrangement between high strain region and the low strain but high gradient area.

Fig. 10 Reorientation of the cells. a Cells (REF-52 fibroblast) with random orientations before stretch. b Reorientation after stretched. c The description of strain reference on a polarized cell.

Fig. 10 Reorientation of the cells. a Cells (REF-52 fibroblast) with random orientations before stretch. b Reorientation after stretched. c The description of strain reference on a polarized cell.

    Besides,some basic functions of cells, such as endocytosis and exocytosis are associated with the membrane tension. In fact, the decrease of tension improves endocytosis while increase of tension brings suppression [103, 104], works have been conducted to research such endocytosis modulating through mechanical stimulus. For example, Boulant et al. [105] used a mechanical stretching device (motor-driven) to stretch the cell substrate to verify the adjuvant effect of actin on clathrin-mediated endocytosis. They found that Jaskplakinolide treatment of the stretched cells causes a dramatic increase in pit lifetimes and percentage of arrested pits under 25% stretching, which show that the clathrin-mediated endocytosis must be assisted by actin in order to complete the vesicle dissociation process under high membrane tension. Thottacherry et al. [106] applied 6% stretch strain to the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell and observed remarkable reduction in fluorescent-dextran (F-Dex) endocytosis compared to the static. However, F-Dex uptake increase significantly at the movement of stretch-relax (Fig. 11b), they thus proposed the CLIC/GEEC(CG), a dynamin independent pathway that can react to the change of membrane tension and regulate F-Dex uptake.

Fig. 11 Effect of membrane tension differences on cellular endocytosis. a Jaskplakinolide treatment increases pit lifetime and percentage of arrested pits of stretched cells. b Stretching regulates F-Dex uptake

Fig. 11 Effect of membrane tension differences on cellular endocytosis. a Jaskplakinolide treatment increases pit lifetime and percentage of arrested pits of stretched cells. b Stretching regulates F-Dex uptake

    For broader fields to discuss, tumor research and rehabilitation engineering may be appropriate [107-109]. Uncontrolled proliferation of tumor causes forces interaction to the ECM and tissues nearby, which can be usually classified into shear, compress, and stretching stresses [107]. Hofmann et al. [110] found that mechanical stretching increase the proliferation of cancer cells, while Helmlinger et al. [111] found that compressive stress inhibits the growth of tumor spheroids. Besides, cells and tissues in human’s joint undergo complex forces during our daily life, which means that rehabilitation research from athletic injury can be inspired from mechanical stimulus as well. As reported, the state of tendon and meniscus can be associated with mechanical loadings. 10%-strain dynamic compression promote anabolic of meniscus while strain at 20% regulate the state into catabolism [112], and the responses can be frequency and time dependent. More interestingly, cyclic tension strains show inhibition of inflammatory of meniscal cells [108]. In addition, experimental results demonstrated that tendons also respond to mechanical loads, appropriate loads enhance tendons while chronic mechanical loading may accelerate tendinopathy [113, 114].
    In this section, we simply introduce several potential applications of DEA-based devices for mechanobiology research, including cellular reorientation, endocytosis, etc. Actually, much more concreate scenarios of this field are still waiting to be explored. Similar with the motor-driven devices, DEAs are at the junction of medical (biology) and engineering science, they can be designed into various mechanical-loading bio-reactors while maintaining cell and tissue affinity. As a promising tool, we hope that DEAs can contribute to the development of mechanobiology.

8 Conclusions

    Exploring the response of cells is an exciting, evolving but challenging task which is significant for biomedicine engineering. Directly, many illnesses can be linked with the disordered cells and tissues functions, which means that it make sense to research cellular responses under various mechanical loadings for better understanding of some diseases or even cancers. Furthermore, if we can regulate cells and tissues into the proper states or functions through mechanical stimulus, some effective and promising treatments can be developed.
    In this work, we firstly provide simple introduce of DEAs, including components, actuation principle, evaluation methods, and several applications on cellular mechanical loading. Then we compare the DEA-based bioreactors with current widely used custom-built bio-reactors, showing their connections and differences, and some prominent properties of DEAs stand out. At last, we give short outlook of DEA-technology in the future mechanobiology research.
    In a word, although much corresponding examples are still lack, employing DEAs as the bioreactors and biosensors for cellular applications are actually opening the door of cellular mechanobiology through a novel method. As the new generation of actuators, DEAs bring some irreplaceable advantages compared to traditional used peers like the motor-driven and pneumatic, they have simpler structure, faster response, higher controllability. In addition,  DEAs are more flexible to design and can be easily cater the request of bio-compatible and combine with microscope to form an experimental system. Among these advantages, the property of rapid response makes the DEA-based devices potential to simulate some extreme conditions, such as sudden cardiac death, which is absolutely difficult to realize by some other bioreactors. Furthermore, continuous advances in material science and microfabrication technology make it feasible and promising to study cellular response of mechanical stimulus through DEA devices since they can be manufactured into micro-nano scale, and then design into high-throughput devices that is meaningful for cellular research. What’s more, because the using of powerful algorithm and image processing tools, this field can be multidisciplinary and a hot issue in the future, which means low threshold for the people to conduct this study.
    Nevertheless, some challenges still remain elusive. Firstly, the drive voltage for DEAs is usually too high (several thousand volts), which makes this technique risky and limit their broad applications. Therefore, much works are still need to cut down the required voltage or electric field. As reported, for example, Shea’s group have tried to reduce the voltage by decreasing the thickness of DEM [115]. Secondly, optimization of DEAs’ basic performance can be crucial, including larger strain, higher energy density, longer lifetime (cycles that can be tolerated, longer shelf time) and better stability, all of these are important to determine DEAs’ further applications in both cell and tissues’ mechanobiology and other possible fields.

Acknowledgments

    The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81822024, 11761141006, and 21605102) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC1200904).

References

[1] C.R. Jacobs, H. Huang, R.Y. Kwon, Introduction to cell mechanics and mechanobiology. (Garland Science, 2012), pp. 3. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781135042653
[2] G. Bao, S. Suresh, Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials. Nat. Mater. 2(11), 715-725 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1001
[3] J.H.-C. Wang, B.P. Thampatty, An introductory review of cell mechanobiology. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 5(1), 1-16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-005-0012-z
[4] S. Van Helvert, C. Storm, P. Friedl, Mechanoreciprocity in cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 20(1), 8-20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-017-0012-0
[5] S.A. Gudipaty, J. Lindblom, P.D. Loftus, M.J. Redd, K. Edes, C. Davey, V. Krishnegowda, J. Rosenblatt, Mechanical stretch triggers rapid epithelial cell division through piezo1. Nature 543 (7643), 118 -121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21407
[6] I. Manabe, T. Shindo, R. Nagai, Gene expression in fibroblasts and fibrosis: Involvement in cardiac hypertrophy. Circ. Res. 91(12), 1103-1113 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000046452.67724.B8
[7] G.-K. Xu, X.-Q. Feng, H. Gao, Orientations of cells on compliant substrates under biaxial stretches: A theoretical study. Biophys. J. 114(3), 701-710 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.002
[8] A. Livne, E. Bouchbinder, B. Geiger. Cell reorientation under cyclic stretching. Nat. Commun. 5, 3938 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4938
[9] J. Ando, K. Yamamoto. Vascular mechanobiology. Circ. J. 73(11), 1983-1992 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0583
[10] D.M. Wootton, D.N. Ku, Fluid mechanics of vascular systems, diseases, and thrombosis. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1(1), 299-329 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.299
[11] K.R. Levental, H. Yu, L. Kass, J.N. Lakins, M. Egeblad et al., Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 139(5), 891-906 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.027
[12] D.-H. Kim, P.K. Wong, J. Park, A. Levchenko, Y. Sun, Microengineered platforms for cell mechanobiology. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11, 203-233 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124915
[13] J.S. Park, J.S.F. Chu, C. Catherine, C. Fanqing, C. David, L. Song, Differential effects of equiaxial and uniaxial strain on mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 88(3), 359–368 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20250
[14] T.D. Brown, Techniques for mechanical stimulation of cells in vitro: A review. J. Biomech. 33(1), 3-14 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00177-3
[15] C.A. Davis, S. Zambrano, P. Anumolu, A.C. Allen, L. Sonoqui, M.R. Moreno, Device-based in vitro techniques for mechanical stimulation of vascular cells: A review. J. Biomech. Eng. 137(4), 040801 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029016
[16] Q. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Niu, X. Zhang, P. Jiang, K.E. Swindle-Reilly, Y. Zhao, Microscale cell stretcher to generate spatially uniform equi-biaxial strain using an elastomeric membrane with a contoured thickness profile. Sens. Actuator B 273, 1600-1609 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.051
[17] K. Shimizu, A. Shunori, K. Morimoto, M. Hashida, S. Konishi, Development of a biochip with serially connected pneumatic balloons for cell-stretching culture. Sens. Actuator B 156(1), 486-493 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.04.048
[18] H.Y. Lim, J. Kim, H.J. Song, K. Kim, K.C. Choi, S. Park, G.Y. Sung, Development of wrinkled skin-on-a-chip (wsoc) by cyclic uniaxial stretching. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 68, 238-245 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.07.050
[19] J. Kreutzer, L. Ikonen, J. Hirvonen, M. Pekkanen-Mattila, K. Aalto-Setälä, P. Kallio, Pneumatic cell stretching system for cardiac differentiation and culture. Med. Eng. Phys. 36(4), 496-501 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.09.008
[20] S. Schürmann, S. Wagner, S. Herlitze, C. Fischer, S. Gumbrecht et al., The isostretcher: An isotropic cell stretch device to study mechanical biosensor pathways in living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 81, 363-372 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.03.015
[21] Y. Kamotani, T. Bersano-Begey, N. Kato, Y.-C. Tung, D. Huh, J.W. Song, S. Takayama, Individually programmable cell stretching microwell arrays actuated by a braille display. Biomaterials 29(17), 2646-2655 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.019
[22] I. Sraj, C.D. Eggleton, R. Jimenez, E.E. Hoover, J.A. Squier, J. Chichester, D.W. Marr, Cell deformation cytometry using diode-bar optical stretchers. J. Biomed. Opt. 15(4), 047010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3470124
[23] N. Bellini, F. Bragheri, I. Cristiani, J. Guck, R. Osellame, G. Whyte, Validation and perspectives of a femtosecond laser fabricated monolithic optical stretcher. Biomed. Opt. Express 3(10), 2658-2668 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002658
[24] K. Kurata, K. Sumida, H. Takamatsu, Open-source cell extension system assembled from laser-cut plates. HardwareX 5, e00065 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00065
[25] L.-E. Mantella, A. Quan, S. Verma, Variability in vascular smooth muscle cell stretch-induced responses in 2D culture. Vasc. Cell 7(1), 7 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13221-015-0032-0
[26] A.J. Banes, J. Gilbert, D. Taylor, O. Monbureau, A new vacuum-operated stress-providing instrument that applies static or variable duration cyclic tension or compression to cells in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 75(1), 35-42 (1985). 
[27] T. Mitsui, H. Azuma, M. Nagasawa, T. Iuchi, M. Akaike, M. Odomi, T. Matsumoto, Chronic corticosteroid administration causes mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscle. J. Neuro. 249(8), 1004-1009 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-002-0774-5
[28] Pelrine R, Kornbluh R, Pei Q, Joseph J, High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100%. Science 287(5454), 836-839 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5454.836
[29] K. Ren, Y. Liu, H. Hofmann, Q. Zhang, J. Blottman, An active energy harvesting scheme with an electroactive polymer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(13), 132910 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2793172
[30] M. Matysek, P. Lotz, T. Winterstein, H.F. Schlaak, Dielectric elastomer actuators for tactile displays. World Haptics 2009-Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 290-295 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2009.4810822
[31] G. Gu, J. Zou, R. Zhao, X. Zhao, X. Zhu, Soft wall-climbing robots. Sci. Robot 3, 2874 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat2874
[32] L. Xu, H.-Q. Chen, J. Zou, W.-T. Dong, G.-Y. Gu, L.-M. Zhu, X.-Y. Zhu, Bio-inspired annelid robot: A dielectric elastomer actuated soft robot. Bioinspir.  Biomim. 12(2), 025003 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa50a5
[33] L. Xu, H.-Q. Chen, J. Zou, W.-T. Dong, G.-Y. Gu, L.-M. Zhu, X.-Y. Zhu, Bio-inspired annelid robot: A dielectric elastomer actuated soft robot. Bioinspir.  Biomim. 12(2), 025003 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa50a5
[34] G.-Y. Gu, U. Gupta, J. Zhu, L.-M. Zhu, X.-Y. Zhu, Feedforward deformation control of a dielectric elastomer actuator based on a nonlinear dynamic model. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(4), 042907 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927767
[35] C. Löwe, X. Zhang, G. Kovacs, Dielectric elastomers in actuator technology. Adv. Eng. Mater. 7(5), 361-367 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200500066
[36] G. Kofod, R.D. Kornbluh, R. Pelrine, P. Sommer-Larsen, Actuation response of polyacrylate dielectric elastomers. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater. 2001: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices 4329, 141-147 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.432638
[37] J. Zou, G. Gu, Dynamic modeling of dielectric elastomer actuators with a minimum energy structure. Smart Mater. Struct. 28(8), 085039 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab2c1f
[38] J. Zou, G. Gu, Feedforward control of the rate-dependent viscoelastic hysteresis nonlinearity in dielectric elastomer actuators. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4(3), 2340-2347 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2902954
[39] J. Zou, G. Gu, High-precision tracking control of a soft dielectric elastomer actuator with inverse viscoelastic hysteresis compensation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 24(1), 36-44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2018.2873620
[40] J. Zou, G. Gu, Modeling the viscoelastic hysteresis of dielectric elastomer actuators with a modified rate-dependent prandtl–ishlinskii model. Polymers 10(5), 525 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10050525
[41] G.-Y. Gu, U. Gupta, J. Zhu, L.-M. Zhu, X. Zhu, Modeling of viscoelastic electromechanical behavior in a soft dielectric elastomer actuator. IEEE Trans. Robotics 33(5), 1263-1271 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2017.2706285
[42] J. Zou, G.-Y. Gu, L.-M. Zhu, Open-loop control of creep and vibration in dielectric elastomer actuators with phenomenological models. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 22(1), 51-58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2016.2591069
[43] S. Akbari, S. Rosset, H.R. Shea, More than 10-fold increase in the actuation strain of silicone dielectric elastomer actuators by applying prestrain. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater., Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 8687, 86871P (2013)  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2009912
[44] F. Carpi, G. Frediani, D. De Rossi, Electroactive elastomeric actuators for biomedical and bioinspired systems. 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). 623-627 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290761
[45] A. Poulin, C.S. Demir, S. Rosset, T.V. Petrova, H. Shea, Dielectric elastomer actuator for mechanical loading of 2D cell cultures. Lab Chip 16(19), 3788-3794 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00903D
[46] A. Poulin, S. Rosset, H. Shea, Fabrication and characterization of silicone-based dielectric elastomer actuators for mechanical stimulation of living cells. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater., Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD). 10594, 105940V (2018)  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2295687
[47] S. Akbari, H. Shea, Arrays of 100 μm x 100 μm dielectric elastomer actuators to strain the single cells. Procedia. Eng. 25, 693-696 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.171
[48] S. Akbari, M. Niklaus, H. Shea, Arrays of eap micro-actuators for single-cell stretching applications. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater., Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD); 7642, 76420H (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.847125
[49] S. Akbari, H. Shea, Microfabrication and characterization of an array of dielectric elastomer actuators generating uniaxial strain to stretch individual cells. J. Micromech. Microeng. 22(4), 045020 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/4/045020
[50] P. Brochu, Q. Pei, Advances in dielectric elastomers for actuators and artificial muscles. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 31(1), 10-36 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200900425
[51] R.E. Pelrine, R.D. Kornbluh, J.P. Joseph, Electrostriction of polymer dielectrics with compliant electrodes as a means of actuation. Sens. Actuator A 64(1), 77-85 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(97)01657-9
[52] S. Rosset, H.R. Shea, Flexible and stretchable electrodes for dielectric elastomer actuators. Appl. Phys. A 110(2), 281-307 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-012-7402-8
[53] F. Carpi, P. Chiarelli, A. Mazzoldi, D. De Rossi, Electromechanical characterisation of dielectric elastomer planar actuators: Comparative evaluation of different electrode materials and different counterloads. Sens. Actuator A 107(1), 85-95 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00257-7
[54] R.D. Kornbluh, R. Pelrine, J. Joseph, R. Heydt, Q. Pei, S. Chiba, High-field electrostriction of elastomeric polymer dielectrics for actuation. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater. 1999: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 3669, 149-162 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.349672
[55] R. Pelrine, R. Kornbluh, J. Joseph, R. Heydt, Q. Pei, S. Chiba, High-field deformation of elastomeric dielectrics for actuators. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 11(2), 89-100 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-4931(00)00128-4
[56] P. Lotz, M. Matysek, H.F. Schlaak, Fabrication and application of miniaturized dielectric elastomer stack actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 16(1), 58-66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2010.2090164
[57] M. Aschwanden, A. Stemmer, Low voltage, highly tunable diffraction grating based on dielectric elastomer actuators. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 6524, 65241N (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.713325
[58] F.C. Krebs, Fabrication and processing of polymer solar cells: A review of printing and coating techniques. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93(4), 394-412 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2008.10.004
[59] O.A. Araromi, S. Rosset, H.R. Shea, High-resolution, large-area fabrication of compliant electrodes via laser ablation for robust, stretchable dielectric elastomer actuators and sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(32), 18046-18053 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04975
[60] S. Rosset, M. Niklaus, P. Dubois, H.R. Shea, Large-stroke dielectric elastomer actuators with ion-implanted electrodes. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 18(6), 1300-1308 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2009.2031690
[61] S. Rosset, M. Niklaus, P. Dubois, H.R. Shea, Mechanical characterization of a dielectric elastomer microactuator with ion-implanted electrodes. Sens. Actuator A 144(1), 185-193 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2007.12.030
[62] P. Dubois, S. Rosset, S. Koster, J. Stauffer, S. Mikhaïlov, M. Dadras, N.F.D. Rooij, H. Shea, Microactuators based on ion implanted dielectric electroactive polymer (EAP) membranes. Sens. Actuator A 130(2), 147-154 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2005.11.069
[63] S. Rosset, M. Niklaus, P. Dubois, H.R. Shea, Metal ion implantation for the fabrication of stretchable electrodes on elastomers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19(3), 470-478 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200801218
[64] F. Greco, A. Bellacicca, M. Gemmi, V. Cappello, V. Mattoli, P. Milani, Conducting shrinkable nanocomposite based on au-nanoparticle implanted plastic sheet: Tunable thermally induced surface wrinkling. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(13), 7060-7065 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00825
[65] L. Hu, Y. Wei, P. Brochu, G. Gruner, Q. Pei, Highly stretchable, conductive, and transparent nanotube thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(16), 1459 (2009).   https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3114463
[66] G. Kovacs, L. Düring, Contractive tension force stack actuator based on soft dielectric eap. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators & Devices (EAPAD) 7287, 72870A (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.815195
[67] C. Keplinger, J.-Y. Sun, C.C. Foo, P. Rothemund, G.M. Whitesides, Z. Suo, Stretchable, transparent, ionic conductors. Science 341(6149), 984-987 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240228
[68] Y. Cao, T.G. Morrissey, E. Acome, S.I. Allec, B.M. Wong, C. Keplinger, C. Wang, A transparent, self-healing, highly stretchable ionic conductor. Adv. Mater. 29(10), 1605099 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605099
[69] G. Haghiashtiani, E. Habtour, S.-H. Park, F. Gardea, M.C. McAlpine. 3d printed electrically-driven soft actuators. Extreme Mechan. Lett. 21, 1-8 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2018.02.002
[70] A. O’Halloran, F. O’malley, P. McHugh, A review on dielectric elastomer actuators, technology, applications, and challenges. J. Appl. Phys. 104(7), 9 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2981642
[71] D. Cei, J. Costa, G. Gori, G. Frediani, C. Domenici, F. Carpi, A. Ahluwalia, A bioreactor with an electro-responsive elastomeric membrane for mimicking intestinal peristalsis. Bioinspir. Biomim. 12(1), 016001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/12/1/016001
[72] A. Poulin, S. Rosset, H. Shea, Toward compression of small cell population: Harnessing stress in passive regions of dielectric elastomer actuators. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 9056, 90561Q (2014)  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2044784
[73] Z. Suo, Theory of dielectric elastomers. Acta Mech. Solida. Sin. 23(6), 549-578 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-9166(11)60004-9
[74] B. Li, J. Zhou, H. Chen, Electromechanical stability in charge-controlled dielectric elastomer actuation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(24), 244101 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3670048
[75] L. Jiang, A. Betts, D. Kennedy, S. Jerrams, Eliminating electromechanical instability in dielectric elastomers by employing pre-stretch. J. Phys. D 49(26), 265401 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/26/265401
[76] S.J.A. Koh, T. Li, J. Zhou, X. Zhao, W. Hong, J. Zhu, Z. Suo, Mechanisms of large actuation strain in dielectric elastomers. J. Polym. Sci. B 49(7), 504-515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.22223
[77] C.T.F. Ross, Finite Element Techniques in Structural Mechanics. Albion Pub. 198 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099846
[78] J. Blaber, B. Adair, A. Antoniou, Ncorr: Open-source 2D digital image correlation matlab software. Exp. Mech. 55(6), 1105-1122 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0009-1
[79] A. Poulin, M. Imboden, F. Sorba, S. Grazioli, C. Martin-Olmos, S. Rosset, H. Shea, An ultra-fast mechanically active cell culture substrate. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 9895 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27915-y
[80] Y. Bar-Cohen, S. Rosset, A. Poulin, A. Zollinger, M. Smith, H. Shea, Dielectric elastomer actuator for the measurement of cell traction forces with sub-cellular resolution. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 10163, 101630P (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2258731
[81] D.R. Gossett, T. Henry, S.A. Lee, Y. Ying, A.G. Lindgren et al., Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(20), 7630-7635 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200107109
[82] V. Lulevich, T. Zink, H.-Y. Chen, F.-T. Liu, G.-y. Liu, Cell mechanics using atomic force microscopy-based single-cell compression. Langmuir 22(19), 8151-8155 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/la060561p
[83] D.B. Serrell, T.L. Oreskovic, A.J. Slifka, R.L. Mahajan, D.S. Finch, A uniaxial biomems device for quantitative force-displacement measurements. Biomed. Microdevices 9(2), 267-275 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-006-9032-4
[84] S. Henon, G. Lenormand, A. Richert, F. Gallet, A new determination of the shear modulus of the human erythrocyte membrane using optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 76(2), 1145-1151 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77279-6
[85] S. Akbari, H.R. Shea, An array of 100 μm× 100 μm dielectric elastomer actuators with 80% strain for tissue engineering applications. Sens. Actuator A 186, 236-241 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.01.030
[86] M. Imboden, E. de Coulon, A. Poulin, C. Dellenbach, S. Rosset, H. Shea, S. Rohr, High-speed mechano-active multielectrode array for investigating rapid stretch effects on cardiac tissue. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 834 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08757-2
[87] S. Wu, L. Qian, L. Huang, X. Sun, H. Su et al., A plasmonic mass spectrometry approach for detection of small nutrients and toxins. Nano-Micro lett. 10(3), 52 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0204-6
[88] X. Sun, L. Huang, R. Zhang, W. Xu, J. Huang et al., Metabolic fingerprinting on a plasmonic gold chip for mass spectrometry based in vitro diagnostics. ACS Central Sci. 4(2), 223-229 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.7b00546
[89] R. Zhang, C. Rejeeth, W. Xu, C. Zhu, X. Liu, J. Wan, M. Jiang, K. Qian, Label-free electrochemical sensor for cd44 by ligand-protein interaction. Anal Chem. 91(11), 7078-7085 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05966
[90] A. Grosberg, P.W. Alford, M.L. McCain, K.K. Parker, Ensembles of engineered cardiac tissues for physiological and pharmacological study: Heart on a chip. Lab Chip 11(24), 4165-4173 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1lc20557a
[91] S. Rosset, A. Poulin, A. Zollinger, M. Smith, H. Shea, Dielectric elastomer actuator for the measurement of cell traction forces with sub-cellular resolution. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 10163, 101630P (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2258731
[92] O. Araromi, A. Poulin, S. Rosset, M. Favre, M. Giazzon et al., Thin-film dielectric elastomer sensors to measure the contraction force of smooth muscle cells. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 9430, 94300Z (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2083905
[93] O. Araromi, A. Poulin, S. Rosset, M. Imboden, M. Favre et al., Optimization of thin-film highly-compliant elastomer sensors for contractility measurement of muscle cells. Extreme Mechan. Lett. 9, 1-10 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.03.017
[94] STREX Inc, https://strexcell.com/product-manuals/ (Accessed Aug 8, 2019).
[95] Flexcell International Corporation, https://www.flexcellint.com/ (Accessed Aug 8, 2019).
[96] P.S. Howard, U. Kucich, R. Taliwal, J.M. Korostoff, Mechanical forces alter extracellular matrix synthesis by human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J. Periodont. Res. 33(8), 500-508 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1998.tb02350.x
[97] C. Tamiello, A.B. Buskermolen, F.P. Baaijens, J.L. Broers, C.V. Bouten, Heading in the right direction: Understanding cellular orientation responses to complex biophysical environments. Cell Mol. Bioeng. 9(1), 12-37 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-015-0422-7
[98] P. Dartsch, H. Hämmerle, Orientation response of arterial smooth muscle cells to mechanical stimulation. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 41(2), 339-346 (1986).
[99] P.C. Dartsch, H. Hämmerle, E. Betz, Orientation of cultured arterial smooth muscle cells growing on cyclically stretched substrates. Cells Tissues Organs. 125(2), 108-113 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1159/000146146
[100] D.E. Discher, P. Janmey, Y.-l. Wang, Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751), 1139-1143 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116995
[101] J.H.-C. Wang, Substrate deformation determines actin cytoskeleton reorganization: A mathematical modeling and experimental study. J. Theor. Biol. 202(1), 33-41 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1999.1035
[102] S. Chagnon-Lessard, H. Jean-Ruel, M. Godin, A.E. Pelling, Cellular orientation is guided by strain gradients. Integr. Biol. 9(7), 607-618 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ib00019g
[103] J. Dai, H.P. Ting-Beall, M.P. Sheetz, The secretion-coupled endocytosis correlates with membrane tension changes in RBL 2H3 cells. J. Gen. physiol. 110(1), 1-10 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.110.1.1
[104] D. Raucher, M.P. Sheetz, Membrane expansion increases endocytosis rate during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 144(3), 497-506 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.144.3.497
[105] S. Boulant, C. Kural, J.-C. Zeeh, F. Ubelmann, T. Kirchhausen, Actin dynamics counteract membrane tension during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 13(9), 1124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2307
[106] J.J. Thottacherry, A.J. Kosmalska, A. Kumar, A.S. Vishen, A. Elosegui-Artola et al., Mechanochemical feedback control of dynamin independent endocytosis modulates membrane tension in adherent cells. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4217 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06738-5
[107] P.K. Chaudhuri, B.C. Low, C.T. Lim, Mechanobiology of tumor growth. Chem. Rev. 118(14), 6499-6515 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00042
[108] A.L. McNulty, F. Guilak, Mechanobiology of the meniscus. J. Biomech. 48(8), 1469-1478 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.008
[109] J. H.-C. Wang. Mechanobiology of tendon. J. Biomech. 39(9), 1563-1582 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.011
[110] M. Hofmann, M. Guschel, A. Bernd, J. Bereiter-Hahn, R. Kaufmann et al., Lowering of tumor interstitial fluid pressure reduces tumor cell proliferation in a xenograft tumor model. Neoplasia 8(2), 89-95 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05469
[111] G. Helmlinger, P.A. Netti, H.C. Lichtenbeld, R.J. Melder, R.K. Jain, Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. Nat. Biotechnol. 15(8), 778 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0897-778
[112] T. Gupta, B. Zielinska, J. McHenry, M. Kadmiel, T. H. Donahue, Il-1 and inos gene expression and no synthesis in the superior region of meniscal explants are dependent on the magnitude of compressive strains. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16(10), 1213-1219 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2008.02.019
[113] N. Maffulli, Overuse tendon conditions: Time to change a confusing terminology. Arthroscopy 14(8), 840-843 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70021-0
[114] K.M. Khan, N. Maffulli, Tendinopathy: An achilles' heel for athletes and clinicians. Clin. J. Sport. Med. 8(3), 151-154 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-199807000-00001
[115] A. Poulin, S. Rosset, H.R. Shea, Printing low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(24), 244104 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937735

References

[1] C.R. Jacobs, H. Huang, R.Y. Kwon, Introduction to cell mechanics and mechanobiology. (Garland Science, 2012), pp. 3. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781135042653
[2] G. Bao, S. Suresh, Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials. Nat. Mater. 2(11), 715-725 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1001
[3] J.H.-C. Wang, B.P. Thampatty, An introductory review of cell mechanobiology. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 5(1), 1-16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-005-0012-z
[4] S. Van Helvert, C. Storm, P. Friedl, Mechanoreciprocity in cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 20(1), 8-20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-017-0012-0
[5] S.A. Gudipaty, J. Lindblom, P.D. Loftus, M.J. Redd, K. Edes, C. Davey, V. Krishnegowda, J. Rosenblatt, Mechanical stretch triggers rapid epithelial cell division through piezo1. Nature 543 (7643), 118 -121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21407
[6] I. Manabe, T. Shindo, R. Nagai, Gene expression in fibroblasts and fibrosis: Involvement in cardiac hypertrophy. Circ. Res. 91(12), 1103-1113 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000046452.67724.B8
[7] G.-K. Xu, X.-Q. Feng, H. Gao, Orientations of cells on compliant substrates under biaxial stretches: A theoretical study. Biophys. J. 114(3), 701-710 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.002
[8] A. Livne, E. Bouchbinder, B. Geiger. Cell reorientation under cyclic stretching. Nat. Commun. 5, 3938 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4938
[9] J. Ando, K. Yamamoto. Vascular mechanobiology. Circ. J. 73(11), 1983-1992 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0583
[10] D.M. Wootton, D.N. Ku, Fluid mechanics of vascular systems, diseases, and thrombosis. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1(1), 299-329 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.299
[11] K.R. Levental, H. Yu, L. Kass, J.N. Lakins, M. Egeblad et al., Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 139(5), 891-906 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.027
[12] D.-H. Kim, P.K. Wong, J. Park, A. Levchenko, Y. Sun, Microengineered platforms for cell mechanobiology. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11, 203-233 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124915
[13] J.S. Park, J.S.F. Chu, C. Catherine, C. Fanqing, C. David, L. Song, Differential effects of equiaxial and uniaxial strain on mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 88(3), 359–368 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20250
[14] T.D. Brown, Techniques for mechanical stimulation of cells in vitro: A review. J. Biomech. 33(1), 3-14 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00177-3
[15] C.A. Davis, S. Zambrano, P. Anumolu, A.C. Allen, L. Sonoqui, M.R. Moreno, Device-based in vitro techniques for mechanical stimulation of vascular cells: A review. J. Biomech. Eng. 137(4), 040801 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029016
[16] Q. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Niu, X. Zhang, P. Jiang, K.E. Swindle-Reilly, Y. Zhao, Microscale cell stretcher to generate spatially uniform equi-biaxial strain using an elastomeric membrane with a contoured thickness profile. Sens. Actuator B 273, 1600-1609 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.051
[17] K. Shimizu, A. Shunori, K. Morimoto, M. Hashida, S. Konishi, Development of a biochip with serially connected pneumatic balloons for cell-stretching culture. Sens. Actuator B 156(1), 486-493 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.04.048
[18] H.Y. Lim, J. Kim, H.J. Song, K. Kim, K.C. Choi, S. Park, G.Y. Sung, Development of wrinkled skin-on-a-chip (wsoc) by cyclic uniaxial stretching. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 68, 238-245 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.07.050
[19] J. Kreutzer, L. Ikonen, J. Hirvonen, M. Pekkanen-Mattila, K. Aalto-Setälä, P. Kallio, Pneumatic cell stretching system for cardiac differentiation and culture. Med. Eng. Phys. 36(4), 496-501 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.09.008
[20] S. Schürmann, S. Wagner, S. Herlitze, C. Fischer, S. Gumbrecht et al., The isostretcher: An isotropic cell stretch device to study mechanical biosensor pathways in living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 81, 363-372 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.03.015
[21] Y. Kamotani, T. Bersano-Begey, N. Kato, Y.-C. Tung, D. Huh, J.W. Song, S. Takayama, Individually programmable cell stretching microwell arrays actuated by a braille display. Biomaterials 29(17), 2646-2655 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.019
[22] I. Sraj, C.D. Eggleton, R. Jimenez, E.E. Hoover, J.A. Squier, J. Chichester, D.W. Marr, Cell deformation cytometry using diode-bar optical stretchers. J. Biomed. Opt. 15(4), 047010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3470124
[23] N. Bellini, F. Bragheri, I. Cristiani, J. Guck, R. Osellame, G. Whyte, Validation and perspectives of a femtosecond laser fabricated monolithic optical stretcher. Biomed. Opt. Express 3(10), 2658-2668 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002658
[24] K. Kurata, K. Sumida, H. Takamatsu, Open-source cell extension system assembled from laser-cut plates. HardwareX 5, e00065 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00065
[25] L.-E. Mantella, A. Quan, S. Verma, Variability in vascular smooth muscle cell stretch-induced responses in 2D culture. Vasc. Cell 7(1), 7 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13221-015-0032-0
[26] A.J. Banes, J. Gilbert, D. Taylor, O. Monbureau, A new vacuum-operated stress-providing instrument that applies static or variable duration cyclic tension or compression to cells in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 75(1), 35-42 (1985).
[27] T. Mitsui, H. Azuma, M. Nagasawa, T. Iuchi, M. Akaike, M. Odomi, T. Matsumoto, Chronic corticosteroid administration causes mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscle. J. Neuro. 249(8), 1004-1009 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-002-0774-5
[28] Pelrine R, Kornbluh R, Pei Q, Joseph J, High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100%. Science 287(5454), 836-839 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5454.836
[29] K. Ren, Y. Liu, H. Hofmann, Q. Zhang, J. Blottman, An active energy harvesting scheme with an electroactive polymer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(13), 132910 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2793172
[30] M. Matysek, P. Lotz, T. Winterstein, H.F. Schlaak, Dielectric elastomer actuators for tactile displays. World Haptics 2009-Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 290-295 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2009.4810822
[31] G. Gu, J. Zou, R. Zhao, X. Zhao, X. Zhu, Soft wall-climbing robots. Sci. Robot 3, 2874 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat2874
[32] L. Xu, H.-Q. Chen, J. Zou, W.-T. Dong, G.-Y. Gu, L.-M. Zhu, X.-Y. Zhu, Bio-inspired annelid robot: A dielectric elastomer actuated soft robot. Bioinspir.  Biomim. 12(2), 025003 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa50a5
[33] L. Xu, H.-Q. Chen, J. Zou, W.-T. Dong, G.-Y. Gu, L.-M. Zhu, X.-Y. Zhu, Bio-inspired annelid robot: A dielectric elastomer actuated soft robot. Bioinspir.  Biomim. 12(2), 025003 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa50a5
[34] G.-Y. Gu, U. Gupta, J. Zhu, L.-M. Zhu, X.-Y. Zhu, Feedforward deformation control of a dielectric elastomer actuator based on a nonlinear dynamic model. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(4), 042907 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927767
[35] C. Löwe, X. Zhang, G. Kovacs, Dielectric elastomers in actuator technology. Adv. Eng. Mater. 7(5), 361-367 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200500066
[36] G. Kofod, R.D. Kornbluh, R. Pelrine, P. Sommer-Larsen, Actuation response of polyacrylate dielectric elastomers. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater. 2001: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices 4329, 141-147 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.432638
[37] J. Zou, G. Gu, Dynamic modeling of dielectric elastomer actuators with a minimum energy structure. Smart Mater. Struct. 28(8), 085039 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab2c1f
[38] J. Zou, G. Gu, Feedforward control of the rate-dependent viscoelastic hysteresis nonlinearity in dielectric elastomer actuators. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4(3), 2340-2347 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2902954
[39] J. Zou, G. Gu, High-precision tracking control of a soft dielectric elastomer actuator with inverse viscoelastic hysteresis compensation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 24(1), 36-44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2018.2873620
[40] J. Zou, G. Gu, Modeling the viscoelastic hysteresis of dielectric elastomer actuators with a modified rate-dependent prandtl–ishlinskii model. Polymers 10(5), 525 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10050525
[41] G.-Y. Gu, U. Gupta, J. Zhu, L.-M. Zhu, X. Zhu, Modeling of viscoelastic electromechanical behavior in a soft dielectric elastomer actuator. IEEE Trans. Robotics 33(5), 1263-1271 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2017.2706285
[42] J. Zou, G.-Y. Gu, L.-M. Zhu, Open-loop control of creep and vibration in dielectric elastomer actuators with phenomenological models. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 22(1), 51-58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2016.2591069
[43] S. Akbari, S. Rosset, H.R. Shea, More than 10-fold increase in the actuation strain of silicone dielectric elastomer actuators by applying prestrain. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater., Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 8687, 86871P (2013)  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2009912
[44] F. Carpi, G. Frediani, D. De Rossi, Electroactive elastomeric actuators for biomedical and bioinspired systems. 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). 623-627 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290761
[45] A. Poulin, C.S. Demir, S. Rosset, T.V. Petrova, H. Shea, Dielectric elastomer actuator for mechanical loading of 2D cell cultures. Lab Chip 16(19), 3788-3794 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00903D
[46] A. Poulin, S. Rosset, H. Shea, Fabrication and characterization of silicone-based dielectric elastomer actuators for mechanical stimulation of living cells. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater., Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD). 10594, 105940V (2018)  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2295687
[47] S. Akbari, H. Shea, Arrays of 100 μm x 100 μm dielectric elastomer actuators to strain the single cells. Procedia. Eng. 25, 693-696 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.171
[48] S. Akbari, M. Niklaus, H. Shea, Arrays of eap micro-actuators for single-cell stretching applications. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater., Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD); 7642, 76420H (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.847125
[49] S. Akbari, H. Shea, Microfabrication and characterization of an array of dielectric elastomer actuators generating uniaxial strain to stretch individual cells. J. Micromech. Microeng. 22(4), 045020 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/4/045020
[50] P. Brochu, Q. Pei, Advances in dielectric elastomers for actuators and artificial muscles. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 31(1), 10-36 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200900425
[51] R.E. Pelrine, R.D. Kornbluh, J.P. Joseph, Electrostriction of polymer dielectrics with compliant electrodes as a means of actuation. Sens. Actuator A 64(1), 77-85 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(97)01657-9
[52] S. Rosset, H.R. Shea, Flexible and stretchable electrodes for dielectric elastomer actuators. Appl. Phys. A 110(2), 281-307 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-012-7402-8
[53] F. Carpi, P. Chiarelli, A. Mazzoldi, D. De Rossi, Electromechanical characterisation of dielectric elastomer planar actuators: Comparative evaluation of different electrode materials and different counterloads. Sens. Actuator A 107(1), 85-95 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00257-7
[54] R.D. Kornbluh, R. Pelrine, J. Joseph, R. Heydt, Q. Pei, S. Chiba, High-field electrostriction of elastomeric polymer dielectrics for actuation. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater. 1999: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 3669, 149-162 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.349672
[55] R. Pelrine, R. Kornbluh, J. Joseph, R. Heydt, Q. Pei, S. Chiba, High-field deformation of elastomeric dielectrics for actuators. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 11(2), 89-100 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-4931(00)00128-4
[56] P. Lotz, M. Matysek, H.F. Schlaak, Fabrication and application of miniaturized dielectric elastomer stack actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 16(1), 58-66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2010.2090164
[57] M. Aschwanden, A. Stemmer, Low voltage, highly tunable diffraction grating based on dielectric elastomer actuators. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 6524, 65241N (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.713325
[58] F.C. Krebs, Fabrication and processing of polymer solar cells: A review of printing and coating techniques. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93(4), 394-412 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2008.10.004
[59] O.A. Araromi, S. Rosset, H.R. Shea, High-resolution, large-area fabrication of compliant electrodes via laser ablation for robust, stretchable dielectric elastomer actuators and sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(32), 18046-18053 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04975
[60] S. Rosset, M. Niklaus, P. Dubois, H.R. Shea, Large-stroke dielectric elastomer actuators with ion-implanted electrodes. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 18(6), 1300-1308 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2009.2031690
[61] S. Rosset, M. Niklaus, P. Dubois, H.R. Shea, Mechanical characterization of a dielectric elastomer microactuator with ion-implanted electrodes. Sens. Actuator A 144(1), 185-193 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2007.12.030
[62] P. Dubois, S. Rosset, S. Koster, J. Stauffer, S. Mikhaïlov, M. Dadras, N.F.D. Rooij, H. Shea, Microactuators based on ion implanted dielectric electroactive polymer (EAP) membranes. Sens. Actuator A 130(2), 147-154 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2005.11.069
[63] S. Rosset, M. Niklaus, P. Dubois, H.R. Shea, Metal ion implantation for the fabrication of stretchable electrodes on elastomers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19(3), 470-478 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200801218
[64] F. Greco, A. Bellacicca, M. Gemmi, V. Cappello, V. Mattoli, P. Milani, Conducting shrinkable nanocomposite based on au-nanoparticle implanted plastic sheet: Tunable thermally induced surface wrinkling. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(13), 7060-7065 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00825
[65] L. Hu, Y. Wei, P. Brochu, G. Gruner, Q. Pei, Highly stretchable, conductive, and transparent nanotube thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(16), 1459 (2009).   https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3114463
[66] G. Kovacs, L. Düring, Contractive tension force stack actuator based on soft dielectric eap. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators & Devices (EAPAD) 7287, 72870A (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.815195
[67] C. Keplinger, J.-Y. Sun, C.C. Foo, P. Rothemund, G.M. Whitesides, Z. Suo, Stretchable, transparent, ionic conductors. Science 341(6149), 984-987 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240228
[68] Y. Cao, T.G. Morrissey, E. Acome, S.I. Allec, B.M. Wong, C. Keplinger, C. Wang, A transparent, self-healing, highly stretchable ionic conductor. Adv. Mater. 29(10), 1605099 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605099
[69] G. Haghiashtiani, E. Habtour, S.-H. Park, F. Gardea, M.C. McAlpine. 3d printed electrically-driven soft actuators. Extreme Mechan. Lett. 21, 1-8 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2018.02.002
[70] A. O’Halloran, F. O’malley, P. McHugh, A review on dielectric elastomer actuators, technology, applications, and challenges. J. Appl. Phys. 104(7), 9 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2981642
[71] D. Cei, J. Costa, G. Gori, G. Frediani, C. Domenici, F. Carpi, A. Ahluwalia, A bioreactor with an electro-responsive elastomeric membrane for mimicking intestinal peristalsis. Bioinspir. Biomim. 12(1), 016001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/12/1/016001
[72] A. Poulin, S. Rosset, H. Shea, Toward compression of small cell population: Harnessing stress in passive regions of dielectric elastomer actuators. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 9056, 90561Q (2014)  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2044784
[73] Z. Suo, Theory of dielectric elastomers. Acta Mech. Solida. Sin. 23(6), 549-578 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-9166(11)60004-9
[74] B. Li, J. Zhou, H. Chen, Electromechanical stability in charge-controlled dielectric elastomer actuation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(24), 244101 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3670048
[75] L. Jiang, A. Betts, D. Kennedy, S. Jerrams, Eliminating electromechanical instability in dielectric elastomers by employing pre-stretch. J. Phys. D 49(26), 265401 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/26/265401
[76] S.J.A. Koh, T. Li, J. Zhou, X. Zhao, W. Hong, J. Zhu, Z. Suo, Mechanisms of large actuation strain in dielectric elastomers. J. Polym. Sci. B 49(7), 504-515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.22223
[77] C.T.F. Ross, Finite Element Techniques in Structural Mechanics. Albion Pub. 198 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099846
[78] J. Blaber, B. Adair, A. Antoniou, Ncorr: Open-source 2D digital image correlation matlab software. Exp. Mech. 55(6), 1105-1122 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0009-1
[79] A. Poulin, M. Imboden, F. Sorba, S. Grazioli, C. Martin-Olmos, S. Rosset, H. Shea, An ultra-fast mechanically active cell culture substrate. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 9895 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27915-y
[80] Y. Bar-Cohen, S. Rosset, A. Poulin, A. Zollinger, M. Smith, H. Shea, Dielectric elastomer actuator for the measurement of cell traction forces with sub-cellular resolution. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 10163, 101630P (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2258731
[81] D.R. Gossett, T. Henry, S.A. Lee, Y. Ying, A.G. Lindgren et al., Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(20), 7630-7635 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200107109
[82] V. Lulevich, T. Zink, H.-Y. Chen, F.-T. Liu, G.-y. Liu, Cell mechanics using atomic force microscopy-based single-cell compression. Langmuir 22(19), 8151-8155 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/la060561p
[83] D.B. Serrell, T.L. Oreskovic, A.J. Slifka, R.L. Mahajan, D.S. Finch, A uniaxial biomems device for quantitative force-displacement measurements. Biomed. Microdevices 9(2), 267-275 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-006-9032-4
[84] S. Henon, G. Lenormand, A. Richert, F. Gallet, A new determination of the shear modulus of the human erythrocyte membrane using optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 76(2), 1145-1151 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77279-6
[85] S. Akbari, H.R. Shea, An array of 100 μm× 100 μm dielectric elastomer actuators with 80% strain for tissue engineering applications. Sens. Actuator A 186, 236-241 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.01.030
[86] M. Imboden, E. de Coulon, A. Poulin, C. Dellenbach, S. Rosset, H. Shea, S. Rohr, High-speed mechano-active multielectrode array for investigating rapid stretch effects on cardiac tissue. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 834 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08757-2
[87] S. Wu, L. Qian, L. Huang, X. Sun, H. Su et al., A plasmonic mass spectrometry approach for detection of small nutrients and toxins. Nano-Micro lett. 10(3), 52 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0204-6
[88] X. Sun, L. Huang, R. Zhang, W. Xu, J. Huang et al., Metabolic fingerprinting on a plasmonic gold chip for mass spectrometry based in vitro diagnostics. ACS Central Sci. 4(2), 223-229 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.7b00546
[89] R. Zhang, C. Rejeeth, W. Xu, C. Zhu, X. Liu, J. Wan, M. Jiang, K. Qian, Label-free electrochemical sensor for cd44 by ligand-protein interaction. Anal Chem. 91(11), 7078-7085 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05966
[90] A. Grosberg, P.W. Alford, M.L. McCain, K.K. Parker, Ensembles of engineered cardiac tissues for physiological and pharmacological study: Heart on a chip. Lab Chip 11(24), 4165-4173 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1lc20557a
[91] S. Rosset, A. Poulin, A. Zollinger, M. Smith, H. Shea, Dielectric elastomer actuator for the measurement of cell traction forces with sub-cellular resolution. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 10163, 101630P (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2258731
[92] O. Araromi, A. Poulin, S. Rosset, M. Favre, M. Giazzon et al., Thin-film dielectric elastomer sensors to measure the contraction force of smooth muscle cells. SPIE Smart Struct. Mater.: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 9430, 94300Z (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2083905
[93] O. Araromi, A. Poulin, S. Rosset, M. Imboden, M. Favre et al., Optimization of thin-film highly-compliant elastomer sensors for contractility measurement of muscle cells. Extreme Mechan. Lett. 9, 1-10 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2016.03.017
[94] STREX Inc, https://strexcell.com/product-manuals/ (Accessed Aug 8, 2019).
[95] Flexcell International Corporation, https://www.flexcellint.com/ (Accessed Aug 8, 2019).
[96] P.S. Howard, U. Kucich, R. Taliwal, J.M. Korostoff, Mechanical forces alter extracellular matrix synthesis by human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J. Periodont. Res. 33(8), 500-508 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1998.tb02350.x
[97] C. Tamiello, A.B. Buskermolen, F.P. Baaijens, J.L. Broers, C.V. Bouten, Heading in the right direction: Understanding cellular orientation responses to complex biophysical environments. Cell Mol. Bioeng. 9(1), 12-37 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-015-0422-7
[98] P. Dartsch, H. Hämmerle, Orientation response of arterial smooth muscle cells to mechanical stimulation. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 41(2), 339-346 (1986).
[99] P.C. Dartsch, H. Hämmerle, E. Betz, Orientation of cultured arterial smooth muscle cells growing on cyclically stretched substrates. Cells Tissues Organs. 125(2), 108-113 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1159/000146146
[100] D.E. Discher, P. Janmey, Y.-l. Wang, Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751), 1139-1143 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116995
[101] J.H.-C. Wang, Substrate deformation determines actin cytoskeleton reorganization: A mathematical modeling and experimental study. J. Theor. Biol. 202(1), 33-41 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1999.1035
[102] S. Chagnon-Lessard, H. Jean-Ruel, M. Godin, A.E. Pelling, Cellular orientation is guided by strain gradients. Integr. Biol. 9(7), 607-618 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ib00019g
[103] J. Dai, H.P. Ting-Beall, M.P. Sheetz, The secretion-coupled endocytosis correlates with membrane tension changes in RBL 2H3 cells. J. Gen. physiol. 110(1), 1-10 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.110.1.1
[104] D. Raucher, M.P. Sheetz, Membrane expansion increases endocytosis rate during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 144(3), 497-506 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.144.3.497
[105] S. Boulant, C. Kural, J.-C. Zeeh, F. Ubelmann, T. Kirchhausen, Actin dynamics counteract membrane tension during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 13(9), 1124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2307
[106] J.J. Thottacherry, A.J. Kosmalska, A. Kumar, A.S. Vishen, A. Elosegui-Artola et al., Mechanochemical feedback control of dynamin independent endocytosis modulates membrane tension in adherent cells. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4217 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06738-5
[107] P.K. Chaudhuri, B.C. Low, C.T. Lim, Mechanobiology of tumor growth. Chem. Rev. 118(14), 6499-6515 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00042
[108] A.L. McNulty, F. Guilak, Mechanobiology of the meniscus. J. Biomech. 48(8), 1469-1478 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.008
[109] J. H.-C. Wang. Mechanobiology of tendon. J. Biomech. 39(9), 1563-1582 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.011
[110] M. Hofmann, M. Guschel, A. Bernd, J. Bereiter-Hahn, R. Kaufmann et al., Lowering of tumor interstitial fluid pressure reduces tumor cell proliferation in a xenograft tumor model. Neoplasia 8(2), 89-95 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05469
[111] G. Helmlinger, P.A. Netti, H.C. Lichtenbeld, R.J. Melder, R.K. Jain, Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. Nat. Biotechnol. 15(8), 778 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0897-778
[112] T. Gupta, B. Zielinska, J. McHenry, M. Kadmiel, T. H. Donahue, Il-1 and inos gene expression and no synthesis in the superior region of meniscal explants are dependent on the magnitude of compressive strains. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16(10), 1213-1219 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2008.02.019
[113] N. Maffulli, Overuse tendon conditions: Time to change a confusing terminology. Arthroscopy 14(8), 840-843 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70021-0
[114] K.M. Khan, N. Maffulli, Tendinopathy: An achilles' heel for athletes and clinicians. Clin. J. Sport. Med. 8(3), 151-154 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-199807000-00001
[115] A. Poulin, S. Rosset, H.R. Shea, Printing low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(24), 244104 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937735

Citation Information

Zhichao Li, Chao Gao, Sisi Fan, Jiang Zou, Guoying Gu, Mingdong Dong, Jie Song, Cell Nanomechanics Based on Dielectric Elastomer Actuator Device. Nano-Micro Lett.(2019) 11: 98. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0331-8

History

Received: 16 September 2019 / Accepted: 21 October 2019 / Published online: 11 November 2019


Additional Info

  • Type of Publishing: JOUR - Journal
  • Title: Cell Nanomechanics Based on Dielectric Elastomer Actuator Device
  • Author: Zhichao Li, Chao Gao, Sisi Fan, Jiang Zou, Guoying Gu, Mingdong Dong, Jie Song
  • Year: 2019
  • Volume: 11
  • Journal Name: Nano-Micro Letters
  • ISSN: 2150-5551
  • URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0331-8
  • Abstract: As a frontier of biology, mechanobiology plays an important role in tissue and biomedical engineering. It is a common sense that mechanical cues under extracellular microenvironment affect a lot in regulating the behaviors of cells such as proliferation and gene expression, etc. In such an interdisciplinary field, engineering methods like the pneumatic and motor-driven devices have been employed for years. Nevertheless, such techniques usually rely on complex structures, which cost much but not so easy to control. Dielectric elastomer actuators (DEAs) are well known as a kind of soft actuation technology, its research prospect in biomechanical field is gradually concerned due to their properties just like large deformation (100%), fast response (1 ms). In addition, DEAs are usually optically transparent and can be fabricated into small volume, which make them easy to cooperate with regular microscope to realize real-time dynamic imaging of cells. This paper first reviews the basic components, principle, and evaluation of DEAs, then overview some corresponding applications of DEAs for cellular mechanobiology research. We also provide a comparison between DEA-based bioreactors and current custom-built devices, and share some opinions about their potential applications in the future according to widely reported results via other methods.
  • Publish Date: Monday, 11 November 2019
  • Start Page: 98
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40820-019-0331-8